💬Interpretation: Accurately comprehend and articulate the meaning of information, including the core ideas conveyed through images, text, or video
📝Analysis: Break down the structure of information, identify the arguments, evidence, and logical relationships within it, and determine how the content is constructed
💡Inference: Make reasonable inferences based on available information to predict hidden intentions or potential outcomes
📖Evaluation: Be able to assess the reliability of information sources and the sufficiency of evidence, distinguishing between facts, opinions, and emotions
✔️Reasoning: Capable of synthesising information from multiple sources to engage in logical reasoning, drawing coherent and reasonable conclusions based on evidence
The regression model indicates that academic foundation exhibits a sustained predictive power over the starting point of critical thinking, explaining 45.8% of the variance.
The post-intervention mean score in the intervention group increased to 21.04, while the control group remained at 14.35. This large effect size (Cohen's d = 1.60) supports the effectiveness of the intervention.
The radar chart shows significant growth across all dimensions in the intervention group, with the greatest increase observed in the evaluation dimension (+36%), indicating that students are better able to assess the reliability of evidence.
The heatmap indicates 15 metrics reached significant levels, with deeper reds signifying more pronounced improvements. These improvements primarily concentrate on higher-order behaviours such as decoding image intent and questioning evidence.
Teachers can embed media literacy and critical thinking topics into existing subjects such as Chinese, Moral Education, ICT, or Integrated Studies without creating new lessons.
Findings indicate that reflective teacher-led discussions enhance students’ evaluative judgement. Classroom application should follow the principle of guided scaffolding with gradual release
After implementation, schools can establish a continuously updated digital literacy and critical thinking resource bank for teacher collaboration and ongoing improvement
Limitation: Students all come from the same school and are not representative.
Improvement: Conducting research in more schools and regions increases sample diversity.
Limitation: not all students excel at or enjoy writing, resulting in unequal opportunities to express their abilities.
Improvement: It is necessary to incorporate additional assessment methods, which can be structured as formative, summative, or holistic assessments.
Limitation: Students in the control group received instruction as usual, so it is uncertain whether the performance improvement in the experimental group was influenced by the novelty effect.
Improvement: Introduce additional instructional activities to the control group to control for the novelty effect.